英语翻译It’s Intelligent Design,Stupid“While intelligent buildings are nothing new,neither is the confusion surrounding their ambiguous definition” said Paul Ehrlich,founder and president of Buildings Intelligence Group,a Minneapolis-based

英语翻译It’s Intelligent Design,Stupid“While intelligent buildings are nothing new,neither is the confusion surrounding their ambiguous definition” said Paul Ehrlich,founder and president of Buildings Intelligence Group,a Minneapolis-based
英语翻译
It’s Intelligent Design,Stupid
“While intelligent buildings are nothing new,neither is the confusion surrounding their ambiguous definition” said Paul Ehrlich,founder and president of Buildings Intelligence Group,a Minneapolis-based intelligent building consultant.
To some ,intelligent buildings also referred to as smart buildings are defined by energy efficient or environmentally friendly technologies .Others define them by way of high-tech tenant amenities like digital signage and directories ,broadband and wireless services ,and building automation.In the most basic sense,intelligent buildings require one or more of their systems to be automated and interconnected.
Ballantyne Village,in Charlotte,N.C.,is one such building with an integrated system.The 800,000-square-foot mixed-use entertainment,retail and condominium property’s HVAC systems,security,signage,lights and fountain controls are operated via a central location.
Ballantyne has sensors that monitor carbon dioxide,and as a result can count the number of people in a room and automatically adjust climate control.Dispensers for restroom soap,toilet paper and paper towels automatically communicate with facility managers when empty.Swiping an access pass opens doors for tenants,while concurrently turning on the lights and heating system.
Despite examples like Ballantyne Village,however,the lack of concrete parameters defining smart buildings has stunted their growth in the United States.Their value which it relates to energy efficiency,tenant satisfaction,reduced labor and long-term cost savings is misunderstood,Ehrlich said.
He said because the technology is largely untested in the states,convincing profitable U.S.developers,investors and real estate managers of its value is difficult.Converting to integrated building technology almost exclusively would require the reeducation of nearly every level of the industry from architects to developers to leasing agents and property managers.
Once builders become acquainted with smart building technology and see its potentially positive impact on their bottom line,Ehrlich said they will warm to integration.
"It's all about the investment on return.The returns on these investments are ridiculous in the hundreds of percents."

英语翻译It’s Intelligent Design,Stupid“While intelligent buildings are nothing new,neither is the confusion surrounding their ambiguous definition” said Paul Ehrlich,founder and president of Buildings Intelligence Group,a Minneapolis-based
总部位于明尼阿波利斯的智能建筑顾问—智能建筑集团的创始人和总裁保罗•埃尔利希说：“现在智能建筑已经不是什么稀罕物,它的定义也不是模凌两可.”
一些人定义智能建筑为智慧建筑,因为它的节能和环保.另外一些人将智能建筑定义为高科技设施,例如数字看板和目录、宽带及无线服务,及楼宇自动化.智能建筑最低要求一套或者多套有联系的自主化系统.
位于夏洛特北卡罗来纳州的巴兰坦部落就是一栋有一套集成化系统的智能建筑.800000平方英尺的综合娱乐平台,分散的,公共集于一体的暖通空调系统.通过中央控制系同意调控的安保,标识,灯光,喷泉.
巴兰坦有检测二氧化碳的传感器,这样就能计算房间内部有多少人,并且自动调节气候.当浴室的肥皂,厕所的卫生纸,纸巾用完的时候,分配器将会自动联系后勤部经理.当租客刷卡进入房间的同时,系统自动打开照明和暖气系统.
尽管有了巴兰坦的例子,智能建筑由于缺乏具体的参数标准而使得它在美国的发展受到限制.欧立希说,智能建筑的关于节能,客户满意度,减少劳工投入,以及长期的成本节约被误解了.
他说,这项技术未能经过美国的开发商,投资者,和房地产商人的检验,所以对于他们来说确定智能建筑能盈利是很困难的.建筑一体化技术的转变,对与从建筑师,到开发商,到租赁代理再到房地产经理中任何一个阶层的再教育.
欧立希说,一旦施工人员开始了解（熟悉）智慧建筑科技,并看到了它潜在的对他们盈亏结算线的积极影响,他们就会开始喜欢上建筑一体化.
一切的关键在于投资的回报,这些投资的回报是荒谬的可笑的在百分之几百.（最后这一句有些纠结,待我明儿问看班上的,敲了接近三个小时,亲,你懂的.）