问一道GMAT语法题~Many daring vacationers who participate in guided boat tours on the Tarcoles River encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows,whose eyes and noses are peeking out from the surface of the murky water.\x05\x05\x05\x05\x0

来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/05/11 16:39:25
问一道GMAT语法题~Many daring vacationers who participate in guided boat tours on the Tarcoles River encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows,whose eyes and noses are peeking out from the surface of the murky water.\x05\x05\x05\x05\x0

问一道GMAT语法题~Many daring vacationers who participate in guided boat tours on the Tarcoles River encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows,whose eyes and noses are peeking out from the surface of the murky water.\x05\x05\x05\x05\x0
问一道GMAT语法题~
Many daring vacationers who participate in guided boat tours on the Tarcoles River encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows,whose eyes and noses are peeking out from the surface of the murky water.
\x05\x05\x05\x05\x05\x05A.encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows,whose eyes and noses are peeking out
B.encountered native crocodiles lurking in the shallows,whose eyes and noses peek out
\x05\x05\x05\x05\x05\x05C.had encountered native crocodiles lurking in the shallows,whose eyes and noses peek out
\x05\x05\x05\x05\x05\x05D.encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows,with eyes and noses peeking out
\x05\x05\x05\x05\x05\x05E.encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows,with eyes and noses that are peeking out
为什么答案是D?不是说with的独立主格结构是用来伴随主句,逻辑主语是主句主语吗?那这边不是用来修饰vacationers不是crocodiles了?

问一道GMAT语法题~Many daring vacationers who participate in guided boat tours on the Tarcoles River encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows,whose eyes and noses are peeking out from the surface of the murky water.\x05\x05\x05\x05\x0
如果不选D,应该选神马?A是题干里的原句,B,C时态有问题,E语法错误.
Many daring vacationers encounter native crocodiles( lurking in the shallows,with eyes and noses peeking out.)
括号里是定语,一个很复杂的定语
这里有个非谓语动词 lurking做定语,虽然非谓语动词不能作谓语,但仍具有动词特点,其逻辑上的动作执行者就叫做逻辑主语,也就是说它逻辑主语是crocodiles,同时有个with的独立主格结构,做伴随状语,有自己的逻辑主语eyes and noses ,也就是说这里的独立主格结构修饰的不是整句话的主句,而是lurking

个人感觉E不仅比其他好,而且是唯一正确的选项。
这个题的主要考点在于动作和其逻辑主语的关系+代词替代这个逻辑主语的准确性。
从题干我们可以看出这句话的意思,那么可以简单分析出里面几个动作的逻辑关系如下:
if has worded well 所说的,是a course of action
使executive犯错的是因为committed to a course o...

全部展开

个人感觉E不仅比其他好,而且是唯一正确的选项。
这个题的主要考点在于动作和其逻辑主语的关系+代词替代这个逻辑主语的准确性。
从题干我们可以看出这句话的意思,那么可以简单分析出里面几个动作的逻辑关系如下:
if has worded well 所说的,是a course of action
使executive犯错的是因为committed to a course of action
而executive犯的错是miss signs of...或者misinterpret them(then 指代signs)
理清以上关系以后,发现:
A:makes it likely to ....的逻辑主语缺失,it 无指代
B:整个句子的句意被改变,B的意思是:executive本身使得这些错误出现。
C:最后的if it has worked well里的it在逻辑上必须修饰a course of action,但是在此句里,语法上it 这里只能就近向上修饰,离本来应该修饰的太远,表意不清,指代混淆。
D:sb's -ing分词在GMAT里属于必错选项。此外,D项里最后的mesinterpreting这个-ing分词没有对应并列成分,必错
E:being 动名词做主语,表示这样1个动作,一种状态,是符合语法和逻辑的。
后面全部的逻辑关系和代词指代都清晰无误。

收起